In what scenario is a game official allowed to review a play?

A game official is allowed to review a play when there is a suspected violation or challenge by a team. This scenario is crucial because it ensures that the integrity of the game is maintained by allowing for the correction of any potential errors in judgment or misinterpretation of the rules. If a team believes that there has been a foul or infraction that affects the outcome of a play, they can formally challenge the call or request a review. This process enhances fairness and allows teams to advocate for their interests during a match, ensuring that all plays are officiated according to the rules and the spirit of the game.

In contrast, requesting a timeout does not inherently involve a review of the play since it might merely be for strategy or recovery. Equipment adjustments are also unrelated to official reviews and focus more on player safety and readiness rather than the integrity of a specific play. Lastly, while officials keeping track of the score is important, uncertainty about the score does not directly relate to a review of a play itself but rather to administrative oversight. Thus, the second scenario is the only one that aligns with the criteria for play review by officials.